[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Again on Windows support (2)
From: |
carlo\.bramix |
Subject: |
Re: Again on Windows support (2) |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:18:05 +0200 |
Hello,
Bug found.
The problem seems to happen because the libguile-i18n-v-0 is missing these
flags: -export-dynamic -no-undefined
Infact it created a static library and not a DLL, I believe it failed for this
reason.
Now I try to quickly fix it, I will retest and I will report the result.
Sincerely,
Carlo Bramini.
---------- Initial Header -----------
>From : "Andy Wingo" address@hidden
To : "carlo.bramix" address@hidden
Cc : "guile-devel" address@hidden
Date : Sat, 20 Jun 2009 12:53:48 +0200
Subject : Re: Again on Windows support (2)
> On Fri 19 Jun 2009 21:11, "carlo.bramix" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Under Cygwin, compilation advanced much more with newer sources
> > (yeah!)
>
> Cool :)
>
> > but it gave another error:
> >
> > GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0 ../meta/uninstalled-env guile-tools compile -o
> > "ice-9/i18n.
> > go" "ice-9/i18n.scm"
> > Backtrace:
> [...]
> > ?: 34* [load-extension "libguile-i18n-v-0" "scm_init_i18n"]
> >
> > <unnamed port>: In procedure dynamic-link in expression (load-extension
> > "libguile-i18n-v-0" "scm_init_i18n"):
> > <unnamed port>: file: "libguile-i18n-v-0", message: "can't open the
> > module"
>
> Perhaps something is wrong when linking this module. "Can't open the
> module" is not a very good warning :)
>
> If you've gotten to here, you might be able to run Guile:
>
> $ meta/guile
>
> If it doesn't error about srfi-1 lib loading, that means you do have
> dynamic library loading working, that it's just a problem with the i18n
> lib.
>
> Good luck,
>
> Andy
> --
> http://wingolog.org/
>
- Re: Again on Windows support (2), (continued)
- Re: Again on Windows support (2), carlo\.bramix, 2009/06/19
- Re: Again on Windows support (2), carlo\.bramix, 2009/06/19
- Re: Again on Windows support (2), carlo\.bramix, 2009/06/19
- Re: Again on Windows support (2), carlo\.bramix, 2009/06/19
- Re: Again on Windows support (2),
carlo\.bramix <=
- Re: Again on Windows support (2), carlo\.bramix, 2009/06/22
- Re: Again on Windows support (2), carlo\.bramix, 2009/06/23
- Re: Again on Windows support (2), carlo\.bramix, 2009/06/26