Re: release update

[Ludovic Courtès]

Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:

> One question is that I've been calling this thing 1.9.1 under the
> assumption that we made a 1.9.0; but that does not seem to be the case.
> Should this one be 1.9.0 or 1.9.1?

I'd say 1.9.0.

> guile-config and pkg-config

We should deprecate the former, BTW, if this hasn't already been done.

> (system xref), procedure-callers, procedure-callees, can work as
> variables get redefined

I think this should be added to the manual as well.

> BUG: SCM_SNAME -> SCM_SUBR_NAME

Ooh, I didn't worry much about it back then.  Should we?

> FIXME: update copyrights

Yes.

(There's "(add-hook 'write-file-hooks 'copyright-update)", which I find
convenient.)

> ecmascript support?

Yes, although it's currently undocumented.

> new function: scm_module_public_interface

Speaking of which, I was thinking at some point about adding a
`public-interface' slot to `module-type', to avoid hash table lookups.
What do you think?

Thanks,
Ludo'.