[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Sting abstraction 2
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Sting abstraction 2 |
Date: |
Wed, 20 May 2009 23:11:36 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
Hello!
Mike Gran <address@hidden> writes:
> Anyway, I backtracked a bit. Today I pushed a new tree
> (string_abstraction2) which should be the same as master except with all
> unnecessary calls to scm_i_string_chars, scm_i_symbol_chars, and
> scm_i_string_writable_chars removed. I largely avoided other
> unnecessary modifications. It is still an 8-bit string build, but, now
> the string internals have been confined to strings.c and strports.c,
> with very few exceptions.
How does it differ from the approach you took a while back (e.g.,
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel/8436)?
(The commit notification message is hard to follow because it contains
many commits in addition to the relevant ones.)
Thanks,
Ludo'.