[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Locks and threads
From: |
Andy Wingo |
Subject: |
Re: Locks and threads |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Mar 2009 23:13:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.91 (gnu/linux) |
Hey Neil,
On Thu 12 Mar 2009 01:53, Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:
> Thanks to a hint from helgrind, I think the problem might be that the
> symbols obarray is not thread-safe. But surely using a mutex for
> every symbol that Guile reads would be terrible for performance...
Dunno, in GStreamer we found that uncontended locks are cheap cheap
cheap. AFAIU they don't even cause context switches. And the reader will
be less important in terms of e.g. startup time once the VM lands.
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
- Re: Locks and threads, (continued)
Re: Locks and threads, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/03/05
Re: Locks and threads, Neil Jerram, 2009/03/10
- Re: Locks and threads, Neil Jerram, 2009/03/11
- Re: Locks and threads, Neil Jerram, 2009/03/11
- Re: Locks and threads, Linas Vepstas, 2009/03/11
- Re: Locks and threads, Clinton Ebadi, 2009/03/11
- Re: Locks and threads, Neil Jerram, 2009/03/25
- Re: Locks and threads, Linas Vepstas, 2009/03/25
Re: Locks and threads,
Andy Wingo <=
Re: Locks and threads, Neil Jerram, 2009/03/13
Re: Locks and threads, Neil Jerram, 2009/03/25
Re: Locks and threads, Linas Vepstas, 2009/03/25
Re: Locks and threads, Neil Jerram, 2009/03/26
Re: Locks and threads, Linas Vepstas, 2009/03/26
Re: Locks and threads, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/03/26
Re: Locks and threads, Neil Jerram, 2009/03/26
Re: Locks and threads, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/03/26
Re: Locks and threads, Neil Jerram, 2009/03/26
Re: Locks and threads, Linas Vepstas, 2009/03/26