[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: srfi-18 requirements
From: |
Julian Graham |
Subject: |
Re: srfi-18 requirements |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:55:41 -0500 |
Hi Ludovic,
Thanks so much for your comments! I'll try to address this stuff
tonight. Stress-testing on NetBSD sounds good!
Thanks,
Julian
On Nov 28, 2007 1:23 PM, Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi Julian,
>
> Overall, the patch looks good to me and your explanations were helpful.
> The caveat is that I'm not familiar with SRFI-18 and not too comfortable
> with these parts of the pthread API that you're wrapping, so I may well
> overlook a few things here and there. I think we'll have to stress-test
> the thing on NetBSD since it's good a catching thread-related
> programming errors.
>
> My comments below are mostly cosmetic. Once you're done with them,
> could you please provide a ChangeLog entry?
>
> Then we'll need to update the doc of the core API, and also add
> documentation of the SRFI module itself (the custom has been to somewhat
> duplicate SRFIs in the manual so that we have all documentation in one
> place).