Re: Introducing `cond-feature'

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hi,

address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

> Rob Browning <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Though I haven't thought about them carefully in this context yet, I
>> wondered to what extent (if any) the following might be relevant:
>>
>>   - SRFI-7
>>       http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-7/srfi-7.html

[...]

> It doesn't explicitly state whether feature identifiers are (partly)
> standardized as those of SRFI-0.  Could we use any Guile feature name in
> here?

I had overlooked the syntax specification which reads:

   <feature identifier>
     --> a symbol which is the name of a SRFI

So I think it rules it out for the purposes at hand.

Thanks,
Ludovic.