[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Stable releases
From: |
Neil Jerram |
Subject: |
Re: Stable releases |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Nov 2006 21:33:56 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hi,
>
> Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I've been wondering whether we could make stable releases on a more
>> predictable basis than we have done in the past.
>
> I'm all in favor of what you propose, but...
>
>> (a) leaving a short while - say 2-3 days - after committing a fix,
>> just in case of a glaring mistake that would be picked up by
>> another developer building
>
> I believe 2-3 days is a bit too short, given the current average
> response time on this mailing list. :-) So I'd rather say one week.
Agreed, one week is better.
> And also it'd be nice if the release maker could send a reminder one
> week before making the release so that people have an incentive to
> update their trees and test.
Yes, good idea.
Regards,
Neil
- Re: Stable releases, (continued)
- Re: Stable releases, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/11/20
- Re: Stable releases, Rob Browning, 2006/11/20
- Re: Stable releases, Neil Jerram, 2006/11/21
- Re: Stable releases, Rob Browning, 2006/11/22
- Re: Stable releases, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/11/22
- Re: Stable releases, Rob Browning, 2006/11/24
- Re: Stable releases, Neil Jerram, 2006/11/27
- Re: Stable releases, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/11/28
- Re: Stable releases, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/11/27
Re: Stable releases,
Neil Jerram <=
Re: Stable releases, Greg Troxel, 2006/11/21