Re: [PATCH] Document pitfalls with `define-class' and `#:init-value'

guile-devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] Document pitfalls with `define-class' and `#:init-value'

From:	Kevin Ryde
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] Document pitfalls with `define-class' and `#:init-value'
Date:	Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:15:47 +1000
User-agent:	Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)

I wrote:
>
> Yes.

(Which is not to say I'm sure it'd look better, just an idea.  Those
bits don't seem like they should be terribly difficult, a niceish or
typical example of each is probably plenty.)

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

Re: [PATCH] Document pitfalls with `define-class' and `#:init-value', Neil Jerram, 2006/09/23
- Re: [PATCH] Document pitfalls with `define-class' and `#:init-value', Ludovic Courtès, 2006/09/25
  - Re: [PATCH] Document pitfalls with `define-class' and `#:init-value', Neil Jerram, 2006/09/27
    - Re: [PATCH] Document pitfalls with `define-class' and `#:init-value', Kevin Ryde, 2006/09/27
    - Re: [PATCH] Document pitfalls with `define-class' and `#:init-value', Neil Jerram, 2006/09/28
    - Re: [PATCH] Document pitfalls with `define-class' and `#:init-value', Kevin Ryde, 2006/09/28
    - Re: [PATCH] Document pitfalls with `define-class' and `#:init-value', Kevin Ryde <=

Prev by Date: Re: make-shared-array
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Document pitfalls with `define-class' and `#:init-value'
Next by thread: Unnecessary warnings
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread