Re: Guile + Boehm GC: First Remarks

[Clinton Ebadi]

On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 10:49 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> You can get it from my Arch archive:
> 
>   $ tla register-archive http://www.laas.fr/~lcourtes/software/arch-2005
>   $ tla get -A address@hidden guile-core--boehm-gc--1.9 \
>         guile-core--bgc
> 
> A tarball and a diff against current CVS HEAD are also available:
> 
>   
> http://www.laas.fr/~lcourtes/software/arch-2005/guile-core/guile-core--boehm-gc/guile-core--boehm-gc--1.9/patch-35/guile-core--boehm-gc--1.9--patch-35.tar.gz
>   
> http://www.laas.fr/~lcourtes/software/guile/guile-core--bgc--patch-35.diff.gz
> 
> SHA1 sums:
> 
>   6b6867dc637a24d7f9f25f99fb7d81c8a54b9190  guile-core--bgc--patch-35.diff.gz
>   4a54c2489dbca7e5415be788c3d1fdc9884584f9  
> guile-core--boehm-gc--1.9--patch-35.tar.gz
> 

Your patch touches a lot of files and reverts them to older versions.
Could you resync with cvs head, and send another patch with only the
real changes? If you don't have time I can do it.

Has anyone actually tried testing the performance of a real guile
program with the patch yet?
-- 
http://unknownlamer.org
Jabber: address@hidden AIM:unknownlamer IRC:address@hidden
Real Men use Free Software; Open Source is for tools
443E 4F1A E213 7C54 A306  E328 7601 A1F0 F403 574B

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part