Re: [PATCH] Fixed `scm_i_take_stringbufn ()'

[Kevin Ryde]

address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
> The problem can be reproduced using the program found at the end of this
> post.  It could hardly be turned into a test case, however.

I made some memory leak checks for myself by demanding that
"(assoc-ref (gc-stats) 'bytes-malloced)" was steady across some
repetitions of a test.  That's actually a different number though (is
it?), but it should in theory be possible to exercise some of the
malloc/free counting or balancing (post 1.8 that is :-).