[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: anti-spam measures
From: |
Marius Vollmer |
Subject: |
Re: anti-spam measures |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Jan 2004 02:39:51 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Byron Hale <address@hidden> writes:
> I notice that the Guile-developers list does not have any
> identifying header.
Doesn't the header "To: address@hidden" suffice? Also, we have
List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library
<guile-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel>,
<mailto:address@hidden>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/guile-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:address@hidden>
List-Help: <mailto:address@hidden>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel>,
<mailto:address@hidden>
all of which could be used to identify messages to the list.
> Secondarily, I have put restrictive filters on domain name recipients.
> Later I plan to remove my current email address. Before I do that,
> I want to see my lists do something like make it difficult to harvest
> email addresses from lists. That could be by mangling the return
> address so that human intervention was needed.
I don't understand. Should the list reflector on the GNU machines
mangle your From: header? Can't you do that yourself when sending to
the list? The archives hide your email address already.
> Any list that does not adopt these measures will ultimately be dropped.
> I just can't take so much SPAM, 4 or 5 times the volume of email
> that can efficiently be handled..
I use bogofilter with great success.
--
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405