[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: doc license section
From: |
Marius Vollmer |
Subject: |
Re: doc license section |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Jan 2004 00:22:07 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Marius Vollmer <address@hidden> writes:
>> Be aware that the feeling on the debian-legal mailing list is that the
>> GFDL is not sufficiently free for materials in Debian [...]
>
> Yes, but I'm going with the FSF here, simply because Guile is a GNU
> package.
To elaborate a bit: I don't see how Guile is different from any other
GNU package when it comes to the license of its manual. When there
are convincing reasons why Guile shouldn't use the FDL, no GNU package
should use it. This issue should be decided by the 'upper
management', for all of GNU...
--
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405
- doc license section, Kevin Ryde, 2004/01/14
- Re: doc license section, Stephen Compall, 2004/01/14
- Re: doc license section, Neil Jerram, 2004/01/15
- Re: doc license section, Marius Vollmer, 2004/01/21
- Re: doc license section, Kevin Ryde, 2004/01/21
- Re: doc license section, Carl Witty, 2004/01/21
- Re: doc license section, Kevin Ryde, 2004/01/21
- Re: doc license section, Marius Vollmer, 2004/01/21
- Re: doc license section,
Marius Vollmer <=
- Re: doc license section, Pierre Bernatchez, 2004/01/22
- Re: doc license section, Paul Jarc, 2004/01/22
- Re: doc license section, Marius Vollmer, 2004/01/22