[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SCM_DEFER_INTS versus error
From: |
Kevin Ryde |
Subject: |
Re: SCM_DEFER_INTS versus error |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Sep 2003 09:44:43 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Marius Vollmer <address@hidden> writes:
>
> Right now (if I'm still uptodate), only one thread can
> execute 'in Guile',
Oh, I thought you'd said previously there could be concurrent such
threads. (I'd meant to try to work up a section for the manual on
such things.)
> Yes.
I realized since posting, that time() on a DOS system might be
affected by the TZ changes made by the other stime.c functions.
I guess all that stuff ought to change to use a little mutex
controlling access to TZ. getenv/putenv would have to cooperate with
that too so a mere temporary change is not seen or overridden.