Re: doco gensym and uninterneds

[Kevin Ryde]

Rob Browning <address@hidden> writes:
>
> As I recall when Marius and I talked about this a while back, gensym
> hasn't been creating uninterned symbols, but it should be -- this was
> a planned fix, and I *think*, but don't have the mail handy, that we
> were also thinking of following CL and adding gentemp for unique
> symbols.

What I should have said was that all I was going to change was the bit
that says,

        The 1.8 release of Guile will include a way of creating
        symbols that are @emph{guaranteed} to be unique.

which I assumed was not updated when uninterned symbols were
introduced.