[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: goops and memoization
From: |
Mikael Djurfeldt |
Subject: |
Re: goops and memoization |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Nov 2002 22:28:50 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) |
Mikael Djurfeldt <address@hidden> writes:
> Currently, compile-method only makes sure the method has a local
> next-method binding (specific to this method cache entry) if that is
> needed. However, there are plans to let it make powerful
> optimizations of the code, with great potential of reducing overhead.
>
> It seems to me that what you need to do is to run the tail of the
> cmethod (BODY-FORM1 ...) through your memoizer. That should fix it.
(An alternative solution is to implement compile-method in C,
memoizing the source code while walking through it. In fact, that
could mean that we don't need to call procedure-source => no need to
unmemoize code.)
- goops and memoization, Dirk Herrmann, 2002/11/16
- Re: goops and memoization, Neil Jerram, 2002/11/17
- Re: goops and memoization, Dirk Herrmann, 2002/11/20
- Re: goops and memoization, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2002/11/20
- Re: goops and memoization,
Mikael Djurfeldt <=
- Re: goops and memoization, Neil Jerram, 2002/11/21
- Re: goops and memoization, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2002/11/21
- Re: goops and memoization, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2002/11/21
- Re: goops and memoization, Neil Jerram, 2002/11/24
- Re: goops and memoization, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2002/11/24
- Re: goops and memoization, Neil Jerram, 2002/11/21
- Re: goops and memoization, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2002/11/21
- Re: goops and memoization, Neil Jerram, 2002/11/29
- Re: goops and memoization, Neil Jerram, 2002/11/29
- Re: goops and memoization, Neil Jerram, 2002/11/21