[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: :export vs. define-public
|
From: |
Tom Lord |
|
Subject: |
Re: :export vs. define-public |
|
Date: |
Wed, 4 Sep 2002 18:02:04 -0700 (PDT) |
>> Those two approaches (:export vs. define-public) to public v. private
>> module contours are isomorphic, so what's the big deal?
> There is no big deal. What makes you think there is?
Well, somebody felt strongly enough about the issue to make the change
from define-public to :export. In 1.5.6, at least, code in `ice-9'
uses :export.
-t
- :export vs. define-public, Tom Lord, 2002/09/04
- Re: :export vs. define-public, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/09/04
- cvs access broken?, Tom Lord, 2002/09/04
- Re: :export vs. define-public,
Tom Lord <=
- Re: :export vs. define-public, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/09/04
- Re: :export vs. define-public, Tom Lord, 2002/09/04
- Re: :export vs. define-public, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/09/04
- Re: :export vs. define-public, Tom Lord, 2002/09/04
Re: :export vs. define-public, Eric E Moore, 2002/09/05