guile-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tool version in HACKING


From: Rob Browning
Subject: Re: Tool version in HACKING
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 10:07:42 -0500
User-agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu)

Thien-Thi Nguyen <address@hidden> writes:

> btw, in fixing this bug we come to the process question of: how do bugs
> fit into the TODO list?  one obvious answer is "don't use TODO list, bug
> fixing (for those deemed needing it) is best managed separately".  this
> is a not wholistic view however; bug fixing takes time which directly
> affects what can be done on TODO.  fundamentally, bug fixing is a (we
> hope) non-repetitive action, something to do when the time is right.
> (and if the particular fix is congruent w/ long term design, the fix
> could be called one-shot.)
>
> so i think it would be useful to consider ways to include bugs in the
> TODO list.  what does everyone think about this protocol:

I'm not sure I follow.  I can see why we might want to have references
to bugs from the TODO list; are you arguing for more than that?  (I
don't think I adequately grokked your suggestion).

Thanks

-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C  64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]