guile-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

address@hidden (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)] Re: elisp test case question


From: Neil Jerram
Subject: address@hidden (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)] Re: elisp test case question
Date: 08 Mar 2002 12:33:47 +0000
User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7

Hi Richard,

I've recently added a prototype Emacs Lisp translator to Guile.  Many
of its names (for modules, functions etc.) use the abbreviation
"elisp".

Thomas Bushnell has suggested there might be important trademark
reasons for _not_ using "elisp", or at least that there were such
reasons in the past.  Can you decide whether those reasons are still
important, and therefore whether I should change "elisp" everywhere to
"emacs-lisp"?

Thanks,
        Neil

--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: elisp test case question User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1
Dirk Herrmann <address@hidden> writes:

> I wonder if the following test case in the elisp test suite is OK:

It's probably no longer *that* important, but there were important
trademark reasons for not calling Emacs Lisp by the name "elisp" in
the past, and I think we should continue to avoid it in official
things.

However, RMS is the real arbiter here.

Thomas

_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel


--- End Message ---

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]