[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: api differences between 1.4 and 1.6
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
Subject: |
Re: api differences between 1.4 and 1.6 |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Feb 2002 16:09:43 -0800 |
From: Neil Jerram <address@hidden>
Date: 22 Feb 2002 23:18:10 +0000
I think you're right that a mechanism would be better than doing it
by hand, and a database that could give the answers about QUX that
you describe above would be amazing. I'll have a think about how we
could design such things.
a moderately context-aware grep works fine for xref...
However, as it happens I've already spent a little time beginning to
sort things manually, and it isn't going to help anyone just sitting
on my hard disc, so I've appended it below, in case it's useful. (It
only covers the C changes, not Scheme.)
cool, i'll use these lists to test the script output. the heuristics
inferred from the lists can also be applied (w/ some tuning probably) to
the scheme side of things.
thi
- Re: api differences between 1.4 and 1.6, (continued)
- Re: api differences between 1.4 and 1.6, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2002/02/18
- Re: api differences between 1.4 and 1.6, Neil Jerram, 2002/02/19
- Re: api differences between 1.4 and 1.6, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2002/02/22
- Re: api differences between 1.4 and 1.6, Neil Jerram, 2002/02/22
- Re: api differences between 1.4 and 1.6, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2002/02/22
- Re: api differences between 1.4 and 1.6, Neil Jerram, 2002/02/22
- Re: api differences between 1.4 and 1.6,
Thien-Thi Nguyen <=