Re: Release 1.6 critical TODO items.

[Rob Browning]

Marius Vollmer <address@hidden> writes:

> We should implement a version of gentemp specifically for psyntax.ss,
> and put it in ince-9/syncase.scm with the name 'gensym' (but don't
> export it).

OK, so how smart does pssyntax's gentemp need to be?  Does it just
need to generate a unique set of symbols across all calls to gentemp,
or do they need to be unique with respect to the current contents of
the symbol table (as I believe gentemp used to be?).

> I will add a NEWS entry.

That sounds great.

Thanks

-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C  64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD