[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pre-inst-guile
From: |
Rob Browning |
Subject: |
Re: pre-inst-guile |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Jan 2002 12:17:07 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.1 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) |
Thien-Thi Nguyen <address@hidden> writes:
> currently check-guile wraps the built guile, setting env vars and such,
> so that it can invoke the test-suite/guile-test scheme script. i would
> like to move the wrapping to pre-inst-guile so that we can use it
> elsewhere (like for doc/ref/autoconf-macros.texi building) in a
> consistent way. i would examine all Makefile.am to adjust callers.
>
> any objections?
>
> any suggestions on a better name than "./pre-inst-guile"?
I haven't looked, but if the "wrapping" just involves environment
settings, then we might just create a script called guile-build-env
and call guile using that:
../wherever/guile-build-env libguile/guile ...
As a random aside:
I have a whole slew of -env commands so I can build/test gnucash and
other projects against various versions of guile i.e.:
gnomeguile-env 1.4 guile arg1 arg2 ...
guppi-env 1.4 guile ...
guppi-env 1.5 cmd ...
etc.
Some of these scripts are parameterized on more than one arg, so that
I can, for example, try gnucash using guile 1.5, but g-wrap unstable.
And yes, you do get combinatorial explosion in your install tree :<,
but at least it's easy to clean things up piecemeal since I install
everything into it's own dir ~/opt/g-wrap-1.2-w-guile-1.3.4,
~/opt/guile-1.5, etc. and the -env scripts know about that...
ugly, but effective.
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C 64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD
- pre-inst-guile, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2002/01/10
- Re: pre-inst-guile,
Rob Browning <=