[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: JACAL, scm
From: |
Dirk Herrmann |
Subject: |
Re: JACAL, scm |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Oct 2001 23:52:12 +0200 (MEST) |
On 18 Oct 2001, Neil Jerram wrote:
> >>>>> "Radey" == Radey Shouman <address@hidden> writes:
>
> Radey> Please see the "Programs and Definitions" section of the
> Radey> formal syntax, where we see
>
> Radey> <definition> --> (begin <definition>*)
>
> Radey> Which indicates that (BEGIN) should be allowable anywhere
> Radey> definitions may appear.
>
> This seems convincing enough. Do you (everyone) think it's acceptable
> to fix this such that (begin) is allowed anywhere, or do you think we
> need to fix it so that it's allowed for definitions but disallowed for
> non-definition expressions?
I don't mind either way. However, as long as the issue is not decided, a
test should be added to the test suite that marks the appearances of
(begin) in non-definition expressions as an expected failure - a comment
should be added to the test case to describe the issue.
Best regards
Dirk Herrmann
- Re: JACAL, scm, (continued)
- Re: JACAL, scm, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/10/04
- Re: JACAL, scm, Tom Lord, 2001/10/04
- Re: JACAL, scm, Tom Lord, 2001/10/04
- Re: JACAL, scm, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/10/05
- Re: JACAL, scm, Tom Lord, 2001/10/07
- Re: JACAL, scm, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/10/08
Re: JACAL, scm, Marius Vollmer, 2001/10/06
Re: JACAL, scm, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2001/10/09
Re: JACAL, scm, Neil Jerram, 2001/10/18
- Re: JACAL, scm,
Dirk Herrmann <=
Re: JACAL, scm, Neil Jerram, 2001/10/18