[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: JACAL, scm
From: |
Rob Browning |
Subject: |
Re: JACAL, scm |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Oct 2001 18:07:34 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/20.7 |
Tom Lord <address@hidden> writes:
> Compilation goals are a complete red herring. As an extension
> language, Guile needs dynamic features, elisp or no elisp. For each
> compiler that is actually developed, restricted subsets of Guile can
> be identified which that compiler is able to optimize.
I only reason I included that is because though I don't really know
exactly what elisp might require, I was extrapolating from what I know
about scheme. For example, the fact that scheme requires
call-with-current-continuation means that some optimizations are
likely to be more difficult than they would be if the language didn't
have such a construct.
I don't agree that at least briefly considering such issues
constitutes a "complete red herring".
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C 64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD
- Re: JACAL, scm, Neil Jerram, 2001/10/01
- Re: JACAL, scm, Tom Lord, 2001/10/01
- Re: JACAL, scm, Rob Browning, 2001/10/02
- Re: JACAL, scm, Tom Lord, 2001/10/02
- Re: JACAL, scm, Rob Browning, 2001/10/02
- Re: JACAL, scm, Tom Lord, 2001/10/02
- Re: JACAL, scm, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2001/10/02
- Re: JACAL, scm,
Rob Browning <=
- Re: JACAL, scm, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2001/10/02
- Re: JACAL, scm, Miroslav Silovic, 2001/10/03
- Re: JACAL, scm, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2001/10/02
- Re: JACAL, scm, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/10/03
- Re: JACAL, scm, Rob Browning, 2001/10/03
- Re: JACAL, scm, Evan Prodromou, 2001/10/03
- Re: JACAL, scm, Tom Lord, 2001/10/03
- Re: JACAL, scm, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2001/10/04
- Re: JACAL, scm, Tom Lord, 2001/10/04
- Re: JACAL, scm, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2001/10/04