Re: JACAL, scm

[Tom Lord]

       rlb:

       One point I was trying to make is that not everyone here is all that
       aware of the history.  Without that background, their reactions to
       your assertions are likely to be different.
       

       tom:

       > Now you are aware.  Instead of dwelling on why the error was
       > committed, why not consider how best to fix it?

       rlb: 

       Tom, you really don't seem very interested in an actual
       discussion


You don't seem very interested in the points I've asked the
maintainers to consider, such as clean interoperability with other GNU
software and the relation of my ()/#f proposal to the history of
Scheme and commonly adopted practices for writing portable Scheme
code.

Instead, you have speculated on non-technical issues and drawn
ridiculous and unsupported conclusions about my motivations.

Which of us isn't very interested in "actual discussion"?

-t