[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Any reason GUILE_X_VERSION shouldn't be defined in a public header?
|
From: |
Rob Browning |
|
Subject: |
Re: Any reason GUILE_X_VERSION shouldn't be defined in a public header? |
|
Date: |
Wed, 19 Sep 2001 16:38:21 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/20.7 |
Dirk Herrmann <address@hidden> writes:
> That means, SCM_GUILE_MAJOR_VERSION would be OK. However, I don't
> have an opinion about the question if the introduction of such
> macros is desirable. For now I just wanted to remind people of the
> naming rules if we were to introduce such macros at all.
Right. Good point.
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C 64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD