Re: @bind

[Marius Vollmer]

Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:

> This is IMO much cleaner than how @bind works now.  Do you think
> you'll have time for this soon?

I will get started now.

> I could have a go, but it is the evaluator ... :-(

Do fear it not, as it is our fear that makes it strong. ;)

> One detail: in the case where @bind creates a new variable on entry,
> should it destroy that variable on exit?

I don't think it should go to that trouble.  The variable will have
SCM_UNDEFINED as its value in that case which should be equivalent.