[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Future of g-wrap (and guile wrappers in general).
|
From: |
Miroslav Silovic |
|
Subject: |
Re: Future of g-wrap (and guile wrappers in general). |
|
Date: |
23 Aug 2001 17:08:34 +0200 |
Matthias Koeppe <address@hidden> writes:
> I would like to add some GOOPS support for SWIG (making GOOPS
> "shadow classes" for C structs and C++ classes), but I definitely
> need help here since I don't do C++ and have never seriously worked
> with GOOPS.
As far as I could tell, any smob you define is automatically a GOOPS
class.
--
How to eff the ineffable?
- Future of g-wrap (and guile wrappers in general)., Rob Browning, 2001/08/20
- Re: Future of g-wrap (and guile wrappers in general)., Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2001/08/20
- Re: Future of g-wrap (and guile wrappers in general)., Alex Shinn, 2001/08/20
- Re: Future of g-wrap (and guile wrappers in general)., Matthew, 2001/08/20
- Re: Future of g-wrap (and guile wrappers in general)., Miroslav Silovic, 2001/08/21
- Re: Future of g-wrap (and guile wrappers in general)., Matthias Koeppe, 2001/08/23