[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: continuation efficiency
From: |
Thomas Bushnell, BSG |
Subject: |
Re: continuation efficiency |
Date: |
08 Jul 2001 18:15:42 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
Rob Browning <address@hidden> writes:
> address@hidden (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
>
> > The whole thing is the job of call/cc. I'm becoming more and more
> > convinced that call/ec is a serious mistake...
>
> Can someone provide an example that makes clear a situation where
> call/ec might be appropriate so we can make sure we're all
> talking/thinking of the same issue here?
More to the point, can someone provide an example that makes clear a
situation where call/cc is *not* appropriate?
Re: continuation efficiency, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/07/06
- Re: continuation efficiency, Marius Vollmer, 2001/07/07
- Re: continuation efficiency, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/07/08
- Re: continuation efficiency, Rob Browning, 2001/07/08
- Re: continuation efficiency,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG <=
- Re: continuation efficiency, Marius Vollmer, 2001/07/09
- Re: continuation efficiency, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/07/09
- Re: continuation efficiency, Rob Browning, 2001/07/10
- Re: continuation efficiency, Dale P. Smith, 2001/07/10
- Re: continuation efficiency, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/07/10
- managing limited resources through GC (was: continuation efficiency), Michael Livshin, 2001/07/11
- Re: continuation efficiency, Rob Browning, 2001/07/11
Re: continuation efficiency, Marius Vollmer, 2001/07/22
Re: continuation efficiency, Rob Browning, 2001/07/29
Re: continuation efficiency, Jim Blandy, 2001/07/08