Re: scm_c_read_string

[Marius Vollmer]

Dirk Herrmann <address@hidden> writes:

> If, however, we are once providing a scm_c_eval_mem, well, then it
> is more obvious that the string/str really indicates a data type
> rather than a general concept.

I'd say that we shouldn't provide scm_c_eval_mem but rather tell
people to use scm_eval_string together with scm_mem2string.
scm_c_eval_string is only for cenvenience and because it is the most
frequently done thing from C.

So, since I don't see a clear winner here, I'll just go with my own
preference... :->