[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GH. Again.
From: |
Marius Vollmer |
Subject: |
Re: GH. Again. |
Date: |
19 Jun 2001 01:24:15 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.0.102 |
Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:
> What I meant was that we should back out new functional additions. On
> analysis, this in fact amounts to just one ChangeLog entry:
>
> * gh.h (gh_init_guile, gh_make_string, gh_string_length,
> gh_string_ref, gh_string_set_x, gh_substring, gh_string_append):
> New.
>
> All of these are just #defines for the corresponding scm_ name.
Yeah, I think we could remove this. It's a recent change, and even
the one that triggered the current discussion, if I remember right.
Ok, so the important thing is to put some big letters into the
Reference Manual that will keep new users from putting too much faith
into the GH interface, but I don't think we can keep them off it
completely until we have a suitable replacement, which isn't something
for 1.6.0.
I'll try to put the plan so far into intelligible words, and add it to
the Manual, without changing anything else, ok?
- Re: GH. Again., (continued)
- Re: GH. Again., Marius Vollmer, 2001/06/16
- Re: GH. Again., Bruce Korb, 2001/06/16
- Re: GH. Again., Neil Jerram, 2001/06/17
- Re: GH. Again., Marius Vollmer, 2001/06/17
- Re: GH. Again., Rob Browning, 2001/06/17
- Re: GH. Again., Neil Jerram, 2001/06/17
- Re: GH. Again., Marius Vollmer, 2001/06/18
- Re: GH. Again., Neil Jerram, 2001/06/18
- Re: GH. Again., Michael Livshin, 2001/06/18
- Re: GH. Again., Neil Jerram, 2001/06/18
- Re: GH. Again.,
Marius Vollmer <=
- Re: GH. Again., Neil Jerram, 2001/06/19
- Re: GH. Again., Ariel Rios, 2001/06/19
- Re: GH. Again., Marius Vollmer, 2001/06/19
- Re: GH. Again., Neil Jerram, 2001/06/19
- Re: GH. Again., Neil Jerram, 2001/06/20
- Re: GH. Again., Marius Vollmer, 2001/06/25
- Re: GH. Again., Neil Jerram, 2001/06/25
- Re: GH. Again., Rob Browning, 2001/06/20
- Re: GH. Again., Marius Vollmer, 2001/06/20