[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t
From: |
Jacques A. Vidrine |
Subject: |
Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Jun 2001 19:01:35 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 01:49:09AM +0200, Marius Vollmer wrote:
> Marius Vollmer <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > and make scm_t_bits an unsigned type.
>
> Err, what was the reason again for making scm_t_bits unsigned?
>
> I just realized that we need a signed version anyway for fixnum
> fiddling.
union scm_word {
unsigned long tag;
void *ptr;
long sl;
unsigned long ul;
};
or something?
--
Jacques Vidrine / address@hidden / address@hidden / address@hidden
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t, (continued)
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t, Jacques A. Vidrine, 2001/06/10
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t, Michael Livshin, 2001/06/10
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t, Jacques A. Vidrine, 2001/06/10
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t, Michael Livshin, 2001/06/10
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t, Jacques A. Vidrine, 2001/06/11
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t, Michael Livshin, 2001/06/11
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/06/11
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t, Jacques A. Vidrine, 2001/06/11
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t, Marius Vollmer, 2001/06/11
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t, Marius Vollmer, 2001/06/13
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t,
Jacques A. Vidrine <=
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t, Marius Vollmer, 2001/06/13
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t, Rob Browning, 2001/06/14
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/06/14
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t, Marius Vollmer, 2001/06/14