[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GRM questions
From: |
Marius Vollmer |
Subject: |
Re: GRM questions |
Date: |
02 Jun 2001 02:17:29 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.0.102 |
Dirk Herrmann <address@hidden> writes:
> On 30 May 2001, Marius Vollmer wrote:
>
> > Wouldn't that be SCM_SMOB_DATA?
>
> Good question. Yes, it could be used. However, SCM_SMOB_DATA was
> introduced at a time when there were no double cells.
I see. Hmm.
> [good analysis]
> I see two possible solutions to this:
>
> * We could introduce macros SCM_SMOB_DATA_[0-3], maybe even
> SCM_SMOB_[WORD|OBJECT]_data_[0-4], with SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_DATA_0 being an
> illegal combination.
I prefer this. Do we need "DATA" in the names? What about treating
the 16 bit field specifically with SCM_SMOB_SCRAP or so that hides the
exact place that field takes in the word. Also, there should probably
be constructors that allow this field to be specified.
> * We eliminate the macro SCM_SMOB_DATA. [...]
- Re: GRM questions,
Marius Vollmer <=