guile-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Should SCM_CONST_LONG be deprecated?


From: Dale P. Smith
Subject: Re: Should SCM_CONST_LONG be deprecated?
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 07:24:13 -0400

Marius Vollmer wrote:
> 
> "Dale P. Smith" <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > Does SCM_CONST_LONG (in snarf.h) really need to be deprecated?  It only
> > uses SCM_VARIABLE_INIT which isn't deprecated. Was there a reason, or
> > did it just fall to the wrong side of the #if my mistake?
> 
> I feel that it should be deprecated.  There are much more types than
> "const long", and I wouldn't want to cover them all.  So, for negative
> completeness, I'd say CONST_LONG should go as well.  It is easy enough
> to use SCM_VARIABLE_INIT directly instead.

Ok. 

-Dale
-- 
Dale P. Smith
Treasurer, Cleveland Linux Users Group http://cleveland.lug.net
Senior Systems Consultant, Altus Technologies Corporation
address@hidden
440-746-9000 x309



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]