[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: On uninterned symbols
From: |
Martin Grabmueller |
Subject: |
Re: On uninterned symbols |
Date: |
Fri, 18 May 2001 07:01:39 +0200 |
> From: Marius Vollmer <address@hidden>
> Date: 18 May 2001 00:18:38 +0200
>
> Martin Grabmueller <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > This is my suggestion, as Marius seemed to want the feature of
> > reading in uninterned symbols again, and have them eq? to the
> > original (uninterned) symbols.
>
> Err, no, they needn't be identical to the original symbols, but we
> should have a way to print s-expressions that contain multiple
> references to one uninterned symbol, have them read back in so that
> the multiple references still point to only one symbol, but this
> symbol might be different from any other existing symbol.
Oh, I see. I have misunderstood you on this. Sorry for the confusion.
Regards,
'martin
Re: On uninterned symbols, Marius Vollmer, 2001/05/24