[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?
From: |
Nicolas Neuss |
Subject: |
Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"? |
Date: |
26 Apr 2001 12:24:23 +0200 |
Martin Grabmueller <address@hidden> writes:
> > From: Nicolas Neuss <address@hidden>
>
> > I guess, no. The decisive point with gensyms is that they are not eq?
> > to any ordinary symbol. That means that the name does not matter, but
> > only memory address. Did you tes if they are eq?.
>
> address@hidden (~/cvs/guile/x/guile-1.4.1): guile
> guile> (eq? 'foo0 (gensym "foo"))
> #t
OK. Then this is an error in Guile. MzScheme does this correctly
(although the names are equal).
Yours, Nicolas.
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, (continued)
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Rob Browning, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Rob Browning, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Michael Livshin, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Rob Browning, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Dale P. Smith, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Rob Browning, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Michael Livshin, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Nicolas Neuss, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?,
Nicolas Neuss <=
Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Marius Vollmer, 2001/04/25