Re: second arg of call-with-values not in tail context

[Marius Vollmer]

Michael Livshin <address@hidden> writes:

> Marius Vollmer <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > 2001-03-27  Marius Vollmer  <address@hidden>
> > 
> >     * r4rs.scm (call-with-values): New definition, defers to
> >     @call-with-values.
> 
> shouldn't it go into r5rs.scm?  call-with-values is not in R4RS.
> 
> hmmm...  in boot-9.scm, r4rs is explicitely loaded.  why not r5rs?
> 
> if the r[45]rs modules are not what their names say, then I guess they
> are misnamed. ;)

Errm, I don't know.  Are we strict about what procedure is in what
standard, etc?  We probably should, eventually.

If anything, I'd say that call-with-values should go into boot-9.scm,
since it is a core feature.  I put it into r4rs.scm because call/cc
and apply are handled there as well.

Hmm.