[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :)
From: |
Andrey Borzenkov |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :) |
Date: |
Fri, 4 Apr 2014 21:08:37 +0400 |
В Fri, 04 Apr 2014 08:37:20 +0200
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko <address@hidden> пишет:
> As for eliminating libgcc dependency I created branch phcoder/no-libgcc.
I'm afraid it results in too much churn that will be unmanageable
module-cmos.o `test -f 'lib/ieee1275/cmos.c' || echo
'../../grub-core/'`lib/ieee1275/cmos.c
[ 140s] ../../grub-core/lib/relocator.c:655:2: error: implicit declaration of
function 'memset' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
[ 140s] memset (counter, 0, (1 + (1 << DIGITSORT_BITS)) * sizeof
(counter[0]));
[ 140s] ^
[ 140s] ../../grub-core/lib/relocator.c:655:2: error: nested extern
declaration of 'memset' [-Werror=nested-externs]
It is impossible to include compiler-rt.h from misc.h due to circular
dependencies and it is near to impossible to find all places where
compiler-rt.h has to be included (at least I do not have an idea).
Someone will need to build test it for sparc, mips, arm (two flavors)
and powerpc (three flavors).
> For ppc only ucmpdi2 was needed actually.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), (continued)
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko, 2014/04/03
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Andrey Borzenkov, 2014/04/03
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Ram Pai, 2014/04/04
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Andrey Borzenkov, 2014/04/04
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Dinar Valeev, 2014/04/04
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Andrey Borzenkov, 2014/04/04
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Dinar Valeev, 2014/04/04
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Ram Pai, 2014/04/04
- Message not available
- Fwd: Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko, 2014/04/04
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2014/04/04
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :),
Andrey Borzenkov <=
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2014/04/05
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Andrey Borzenkov, 2014/04/05
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2014/04/05
- Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Andrey Borzenkov, 2014/04/05
Re: [RFC PATCH 21/23] powerpc64 is not necessarily BigEndian anymore! :), Ram Pai, 2014/04/02