[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 0/7] arm-uboot: support for different RAM bases
|
From: |
Ian Campbell |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 0/7] arm-uboot: support for different RAM bases |
|
Date: |
Sun, 29 Dec 2013 19:10:30 +0000 |
On Sun, 2013-12-29 at 18:47 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> (there is an
> unrelated issue on cubieboard2 relating to the scan for the uboot API
> signature, which I'm still investigating, but I hacked around it here
> and things worked fine otherwise).
FYI: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2013-December/169918.html
Ian.
- [PATCH 2/7] mkimage: Replace hardcoded 0x400 in R_ARM_ABS32 relocation, (continued)
- [PATCH 2/7] mkimage: Replace hardcoded 0x400 in R_ARM_ABS32 relocation, Ian Campbell, 2013/12/29
- [PATCH 1/7] mkimage: Refactor IMAGE_EFI checks into a function grub_image_needs_reloc., Ian Campbell, 2013/12/29
- [PATCH 3/7] mkimage: account for space for trampolines earlier, Ian Campbell, 2013/12/29
- [PATCH 4/7] mkimage: make R_ARM_ABS32 debug output more consistent, Ian Campbell, 2013/12/29
- [PATCH 5/7] mkimage: allow linking at address 0, Ian Campbell, 2013/12/29
- [PATCH 6/7] mkimage: support images which require full relocation at mkimage time., Ian Campbell, 2013/12/29
- [PATCH 7/7] arm-uboot: support relocation at installation time, Ian Campbell, 2013/12/29
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] arm-uboot: support for different RAM bases,
Ian Campbell <=
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] arm-uboot: support for different RAM bases, Leif Lindholm, 2013/12/29
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] arm-uboot: support for different RAM bases, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2013/12/29