[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should LDM check be less aggressive?
|
From: |
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko |
|
Subject: |
Re: Should LDM check be less aggressive? |
|
Date: |
Sun, 20 Jan 2013 22:58:26 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.11) Gecko/20121122 Icedove/10.0.11 |
On 21.11.2012 03:58, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> + if (p->msdostype == GRUB_PC_PARTITION_TYPE_SFS)
SFS is confusing as the partition in question isn't SFS, it just happens
that LDM and SFS ids collide.
Also another problem is that of booting in case of corrupted msdos table
if LDM is intact but given that the kernels won't be able to recognize
such a case anyway it's a minor one. Could you update the patch not to
mention SFS?
--
Regards
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: Should LDM check be less aggressive?,
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko <=