|
From: | Bruce Dubbs |
Subject: | Re: Documenting the GRUB configure (during build) |
Date: | Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:17:18 -0600 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.16) Gecko/20080722 SeaMonkey/1.1.11 |
Robert Millan wrote:
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 03:42:24PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:I'm afraid I don't agree that the solution to documenting changes is not to document anything. That may be a little harsh, but I firmly believe that documentation is key to acceptance.It's OK. Well my concern is about long-term maintainability. We're very busy all the time, and redundancy in our codebase often results in birot. Can I count on your commitment that you'll be around to adjust this documentation if it gets out of sync, etc?
Yes, I think you can. I've always been interested in the boot process. I remember disassembling the boot sector back in the late '80s to see what was going on. That was before I knew about open source and the use of the internet became generally available (I didn't have it).
I went back to school late in life (91-93) and my dissertation was on the effects of comments on the maintainability of source code. :)
Now I'm semi-retired and I think I can commit to a few years. I don't think my interest will wane. :)
-- Bruce
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |