[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: r2558 made another use case for make_relative_to_its_root visible (e
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
Re: r2558 made another use case for make_relative_to_its_root visible (else SEGFAULT) |
Date: |
Sat, 5 Sep 2009 22:37:29 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 09:04:19PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 08:25:01PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > Am Freitag, den 04.09.2009, 21:26 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> > > On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 08:52:44PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
> > > > r2558 actually enabled this code path which was (almost) never executed
> > > > before in probe():
> > >
> > > A proper fix for this would be too intrusive for 1.97. Unless someone
> > > has a bright idea, I'll comment it out untill we've released.
> >
> > For the release this is probable the best idea.
>
> Agreed.
Ok, done.
> Sorry for this regression.
Not your fault! Hopefully I'll remember to re-enable this after 1.97 is
released.
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."