[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Support splitting SOURCE in multiple rmk files
From: |
Pavel Roskin |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Support splitting SOURCE in multiple rmk files |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:32:01 -0400 |
On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 11:13 +0800, Bean wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 3:31 AM, Pavel Roskin<address@hidden> wrote:
> > While at that, it would be nice to use a special notation for the
> > partial dependencies.
> >
> > Something like:
> >
> > aa:+ aa.o
> > aa:+ bb.o
>
> Hi,
>
> Is this new syntax for GNU make ? My version report error when using :+ .
No. I suggested syntax that would indicate that it's not a complete
make rule.
If we use Ruby to join the rules, we can replace ":+" with ":" in the
result.
> > Please don't use "_DEFINED" to mean "rule emitted", it's confusing.
>
> How about _RULES_DEFINED ?
I'm fine with anything that is descriptive.
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
- [PATCH] Support splitting SOURCE in multiple rmk files, Bean, 2009/06/24
- Re: [PATCH] Support splitting SOURCE in multiple rmk files, Robert Millan, 2009/06/24
- Re: [PATCH] Support splitting SOURCE in multiple rmk files, Bean, 2009/06/24
- Re: [PATCH] Support splitting SOURCE in multiple rmk files, Robert Millan, 2009/06/24
- Re: [PATCH] Support splitting SOURCE in multiple rmk files, Pavel Roskin, 2009/06/25
- Re: [PATCH] Support splitting SOURCE in multiple rmk files, Bean, 2009/06/25
- Re: [PATCH] Support splitting SOURCE in multiple rmk files,
Pavel Roskin <=
- Re: [PATCH] Support splitting SOURCE in multiple rmk files, Bean, 2009/06/26
- Re: [PATCH] Support splitting SOURCE in multiple rmk files, Pavel Roskin, 2009/06/26