[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 21:33:28 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 03:02:43AM +0200, Alex Besogonov wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
>>> Private part of the endorsement key _never_ leaves the device (if
>>> manufacturer uses the recommended TPM_CreateEndorsementKeyPair
>>> method). Even device manufacturer doesn't know it.
>> Even if that is true (which I doubt), it's merely incidental, because...
> It's not really incidental. TCG was initially started as a group to
> develop trusted computing platform. MS later tried to hijack it to
> realize their wet dream of locked-down computer.
Well, sounds like either the hijack was succesful, or the wet dream was
shared.
>>> Public key is then
>>> signed by manufacturer's certificate. This ensures that the private
>>> key can't be compromised.
>> ...this ensures that $evil_bob can challenge you to prove you're running
>> his proprietary anti-user software.
> So I won't be able to answer $evil_bob challenge in any case, since I'm
> mostly running Linux now.
That depends on what he considers trusted. The capabilities are there and
got merged in Linux tree. And who's scared of Vista anyways? ;-)
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, (continued)
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Jan Alsenz, 2009/02/21
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Robert Millan, 2009/02/21
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Isaac Dupree, 2009/02/21
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Robert Millan, 2009/02/27
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Alex Besogonov, 2009/02/21
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Robert Millan, 2009/02/21
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Alex Besogonov, 2009/02/21
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM,
Robert Millan <=
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Alex Besogonov, 2009/02/21
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, phcoder, 2009/02/21
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Robert Millan, 2009/02/21
- Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Robert Millan, 2009/02/21
Re: A _good_ and valid use for TPM, Alex Besogonov, 2009/02/20