[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Autoloading WAS: normal/cmdline bug & patch
From: |
Yoshinori K. Okuji |
Subject: |
Re: Autoloading WAS: normal/cmdline bug & patch |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Jun 2004 20:54:19 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.6.1 |
On Saturday 19 June 2004 18:01, Marco Gerards wrote:
> So I think it is not needed to unload those filesystems and that
> keeping those loaded will only boost performance. If it is required
> we can use (as Tomas proposed, IIRC) a user setable variable to
> indicate if modules should be unloaded or not.
Maybe. Since this is easily fixed, I have no strong taste on this. It's
just one line anyway.
As Tomas also agrees, let's go in this way. Is there any other kind of
modules which should be autoloaded?
Okuji
- Re: normal/cmdline bug & patch, (continued)
- Re: normal/cmdline bug & patch, Tomas Ebenlendr, 2004/06/18
- Re: normal/cmdline bug & patch, Marco Gerards, 2004/06/18
- Re: Autoloading WAS: normal/cmdline bug & patch, Tomas Ebenlendr, 2004/06/18
- Re: Autoloading WAS: normal/cmdline bug & patch, Marco Gerards, 2004/06/18
- Re: Autoloading WAS: normal/cmdline bug & patch, Marco Gerards, 2004/06/18
- Re: Autoloading WAS: normal/cmdline bug & patch, Tomas Ebenlendr, 2004/06/18
- Re: Autoloading WAS: normal/cmdline bug & patch, Tomas Ebenlendr, 2004/06/18
- Re: Autoloading WAS: normal/cmdline bug & patch, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2004/06/19
- Re: Autoloading WAS: normal/cmdline bug & patch, Marco Gerards, 2004/06/19
- Re: Autoloading WAS: normal/cmdline bug & patch, Jeroen Dekkers, 2004/06/19
- Re: Autoloading WAS: normal/cmdline bug & patch,
Yoshinori K. Okuji <=
- Re: Autoloading WAS: normal/cmdline bug & patch, Tomas Ebenlendr, 2004/06/19