[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: normal vs. rescue mode commands
From: |
Yoshinori K. Okuji |
Subject: |
Re: normal vs. rescue mode commands |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Jun 2004 13:08:25 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.3 |
On Wednesday 02 June 2004 16:43, Tomas Ebenlendr wrote:
> And what about enabling rescue mode commands in normal mode?
I don't think it would be very useful. Even the command 'unset' will be
implemented in a different way, say, to support set/unset hooks for
special variables.
> If it is not good idea, what about command 'rescuecmd' which will
> execute one command of rescue mode?
Why do you want this?
Okuji
- Re: normal vs. rescue mode commands, (continued)
- Re: normal vs. rescue mode commands, Jeroen Dekkers, 2004/06/09
- Re: normal vs. rescue mode commands, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2004/06/09
- Re: normal vs. rescue mode commands, Jeroen Dekkers, 2004/06/09
- Re: normal vs. rescue mode commands, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2004/06/09
- Re: normal vs. rescue mode commands, Jeroen Dekkers, 2004/06/09
- Re: normal vs. rescue mode commands, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2004/06/09
- Re: normal vs. rescue mode commands, Jeroen Dekkers, 2004/06/09
- Re: normal vs. rescue mode commands, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2004/06/10
- Re: normal vs. rescue mode commands, Tomas Ebenlendr, 2004/06/09
- Re: normal vs. rescue mode commands, Tomas Ebenlendr, 2004/06/09
- Re: normal vs. rescue mode commands,
Yoshinori K. Okuji <=
Re: ext2 find patch, Marco Gerards, 2004/06/27