Re: [groff] hyphenation issues (PATCH)

[G. Branden Robinson]

At 2018-05-04T19:23:15-0400, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> I've attached a proposed patch.  I'm not completely thrilled with it
> because some people might interpret it as suggesting that .hy 62 is
> valid; it isn't, but not because it is too large.  Still, I would prefer
> to tell people the limit being tested than to omit it.
> 
> Test case and test case output also attached.
> 
> Thoughts?

Here is, I think, the third iteration of the patch, taking into account
Ralph's feedback on the length and overworked nature of the previous
iteration's diagnostic messages.

As usual, please find attached:
1. the patch
2. a test case
3. troff output from the test case

-- 
Regards,
Branden

hyph.diff
Description: Text Data

hy.trf
Description: Text document

hy.trf.out
Description: Text document

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature