Re: [groff] PSPIC vs PDFPIC: adjust documentation to reality, or the reverse?

[Ralph Corderoy]

Good afternoon Bernhard,

> > So pdfpic is an extension of pspic. By that you can now even replace
> > all PSPIC by PDFPIC, nothing gets lost by that.
>
> I read this as suggesting that results with -Tps and -Tpdf should be
> equivalent.

Strongly agree.

> Would it hence be sensible to change PDFPIC to fit the description

+1.  Even though it may cause some existing documents to change if
reproduced.  I don't think PDFPIC is old or widespread enough, to try
and preserve its (broken) behaviour.

-- 
Cheers, Ralph.
https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy