[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Possible Bug in s.tmac (forked from: [Groff] pointsize changes in .N
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: Possible Bug in s.tmac (forked from: [Groff] pointsize changes in .NH ms-macro) |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Sep 2004 18:09:17 +0200 (CEST) |
> I note that you changed my spelling of 'initialisation' to
> 'initialization'. Personally, I think this Americanised spelling is
> ugly, but I'm sure that is just because I'm British, and our friends
> on the west side of the Atlantic would disagree -- in any case, it
> isn't *really* important.
Everything in the groff docs use `-zation' instead of `-sation'. If
you find something different, just tell me. We could change
everything to `-sation', but since groff uses American English
hyphenation patterns by default, I think it is not the worst choice to
stay with American English (without using `nite' or `brite', of
course).
Werner
PS: In school I have learned Brrrrritish English :-)
- Re: Possible Bug in s.tmac (forked from: [Groff] pointsize changes in .NH ms-macro), Keith MARSHALL, 2004/09/24
- Re: Possible Bug in s.tmac (forked from: [Groff] pointsize changes in .NH ms-macro),
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: Possible Bug in s.tmac (forked from: [Groff] pointsize changes in .NH ms-macro), Peter Schaffter, 2004/09/24
- Re: Possible Bug in s.tmac (forked from: [Groff] pointsize changes in .NH ms-macro), Meg McRoberts, 2004/09/24
- [Groff] Spelling [was Possible Bug in s.tmac], Peter Schaffter, 2004/09/25
- Re: [Groff] Spelling [was Possible Bug in s.tmac], Meg McRoberts, 2004/09/25
- Re: [Groff] Spelling [was Possible Bug in s.tmac], Keith Marshall, 2004/09/25
- Re: [Groff] Spelling [was Possible Bug in s.tmac], Clarke Echols, 2004/09/25