[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gpsd-dev] buzzkill is gone, please re-test
From: |
Greg Troxel |
Subject: |
Re: [gpsd-dev] buzzkill is gone, please re-test |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Jan 2015 08:06:59 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.4 (berkeley-unix) |
"Gary E. Miller" <address@hidden> writes:
>> Someone has to rewrite the gpsd PPS code to not depend on the
>> non-standard TIOCMIWAIT and just use RFC2783 calls. I left some
>> comments explaining this, but haven't done it yet.
>
> I have a general plan, but no point coding without a debug platform.
>
> Can't use just RFC2783 calls. Some way to poll the RFC2783 needs to
> be used to replace the simple wait fot input that TIOCMIWAIT provides.
Sure, and I think basically you just have to usleep. I left out the
"and of course POSIX".
> RFC2783 tells you what happened, but will not wake you up to tell you
> something happened.
Optionally it can, but none of the implementations do.
> Also, most linux kernels do not have RFC2783 enabled so TIOCMIWAIT
> must still be supported when available.
Sorry, I left out the "and support all the variations of faciltities
which might be available" in answering too quickly.
pgpijoIAKfXeQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [gpsd-dev] buzzkill is gone, please re-test, (continued)
Re: [gpsd-dev] buzzkill is gone, please re-test, Harlan Stenn, 2015/01/29
- Re: [gpsd-dev] buzzkill is gone, please re-test, Gary E. Miller, 2015/01/29
- Re: [gpsd-dev] buzzkill is gone, please re-test, Greg Troxel, 2015/01/29
- Re: [gpsd-dev] buzzkill is gone, please re-test, Gary E. Miller, 2015/01/29
- Re: [gpsd-dev] buzzkill is gone, please re-test, Harlan Stenn, 2015/01/30
- Re: [gpsd-dev] buzzkill is gone, please re-test, Greg Troxel, 2015/01/30
Re: [gpsd-dev] buzzkill is gone, please re-test, Greg Troxel, 2015/01/30
Re: [gpsd-dev] buzzkill is gone, please re-test,
Greg Troxel <=