[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gpsd-dev] Working towards 3.10 release
From: |
Hal Murray |
Subject: |
Re: [gpsd-dev] Working towards 3.10 release |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Nov 2013 21:05:51 -0800 |
scons -c is still leaving a lot of stuff that I expect to get deleted.
after scons -c:
address@hidden gpsd2]$ ll -R .sc*
-rw-rw-r-- 1 murray murray 0 Nov 7 20:36 .scons-option-cache
-rw-rw-r-- 1 murray murray 153360 Nov 7 20:36 .sconsign.dblite
.sconf_temp:
total 296
-rw-rw-r-- 1 murray murray 79 Nov 6 09:22 conftest_0.c
-rw-rw-r-- 1 murray murray 924 Nov 6 09:22 conftest_0.o
-rwxrwxr-x 1 murray murray 7309 Nov 6 09:22 conftest_0
-rw-rw-r-- 1 murray murray 79 Nov 6 09:22 conftest_1.c
-rw-rw-r-- 1 murray murray 924 Nov 6 09:22 conftest_1.o
....
It also misses www/*.html
----------
I've got two different copies of www/cycle.png
-rw-rw-r-- 1 murray murray 12690 Oct 31 16:12 gpsd/www/cycle.png
-rw-rw-r-- 1 murray murray 11626 Nov 2 22:58 gpsd2/www/cycle.png
I've never run scons in gpsd. It is just a clean reference to see what scons
-c is leaving behind.
The newer one looks better. The text for RTIME is mangled in the older one.
The older one came from git.
I see a www/cycle.dia and I had to install dia to run scons www so I assume
the newer one came from scons www as run on my system. (The time stamps
match the html files.)
I don't know what you are trying to do. I'd expect either cycle.png wouldn't
be in git or it wouldn't get created by scons www. The latter would be
handy for users like me so dia isn't required but it makes life harder for
you to release a new cycle.dia.
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.